Search THE READING ROOM

Friday, May 28, 2010

"A journalist shall protect confidential sources of information"

And no one, not even the government, should force journalists to reveal their sources.

Here, in this letter to Tehelka (May 29), Bangalore-based Gauri Lankesh, a former editor of Lankesh Patrike, describes how the united media fought back when the Karnataka government tried to curb the press:
A UNITED MEDIA FIGHTS BACK
“In our democratic system the fourth estate will brook no interference by the Establishment." That was the stinging message sent by Prajavani, a Kannada daily, to the government of Karnataka last week.

The BS Yeddyurappa-led BJP government -- which is floundering between sexual scandals and financial scams -- had set forth to curb an independent and critical press. Last month, it had tested the waters by issuing threatening notices to two journalists of Prajavani.

In those notices the police of Shimoga district had threatened to charge reporter Rahul Belagali and Associate Editor Padmaraj Dandavati under the dreaded Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act of 1967, and various other Acts if they did not reveal the source of information in connection with an interview of a Naxal leader which was published sometime last year.

The notices -- instead of making the journalists meek -- made the media see red. When the Editors Guild of India rapped the knuckles of the state government saying it had no business to ask journalists for their source of information, Prajavani was emboldened. It launched a campaign against the government to protect the rights of the media.

Various groups of journalists joined the campaign and held protests across the state. Journalists of Shimoga  -- Yeddyurappa’s home district -- went a step further and threatened to boycott a press conference by the chief minister unless the police withdrew the notices.

In the face of such a strong resistance by Prajavani and a united media, a shamefaced government was left with no choice but to immediately withdraw the notices.

In the State’s war against the Maoists, it was the government of Karnataka which took the first step towards gagging the media. That Prajavani and the media did not allow the government to succeed in its machinations is heartening. In doing so, they have set a commendable example to others across the country. -- Gauri Lankesh

Thursday, May 27, 2010

How to write your first book


Sidin Vadukut is the managing editor of livemint.com, Mint's website (one of the best I have seen). He is also a technologist (National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli) with an MBA degree from IIM-A. Now he also has a novel to his credit, Dork! The Incredible Adventures Of Robin Einstein Verghese. He was in Bangalore recently to launch the book (you can read about First Year student Dipshikha Kaur Chowdhury's interaction with him in The Commits Chronicle).

Back in January, when Dork! had not yet been released, Vadukut wrote an eloquent and instructive article in Mint describing how he wrote his first book. Reading it will also give you an insight into the publishing world in India.

In the concluding paragraphs he offers a bonus to everyone intested in knowing more about writing and writers:
As for your first book, a good place to start is perhaps with a few audio interviews with the best authors. These interviews will tell you not only how these writers find inspiration, but also how, where and, most importantly, why they write. Get them here:


Afterwards, read this excerpt from Dork! and check out Vadukut's blog, Domain Maximus.
  • A copy of Dork!, autographed by the author, has been placed in the Commits library. Thanks, Dipshikha!

The best cameras for under Rs.50K

Zahid H Javali offers a comprehensive beginner's guide to buying a digital camera in Mint.

He discusses the pros and cons of 10 digicams, from the Rs.10,000 Sony Cybershot DSC-S930 to the Rs.49,999 Canon EOS 550D (pictured).

This is an excellent compendium for those about to buy their first digital camera.

Tuesday, May 25, 2010

The most professional newspaper coverage of the A-I tragedy in Mangalore

The loss of human life is always a terrible thing. But when the first hint of a disaster arrives in newsrooms, it's the logistics of the ensuing coverage that dominates the thoughts of the people in charge. Decisions are made at this point about sending reporters and photographers to the spot, about calling in extra staff, about making room for all the stories coming in from different sources.

Another important point of debate: What should Page One look like?

On the day after Air India flight IX-182 crashed while landing at Mangalore airport, it's Bangalore's DNA that stood tall in terms of coverage, with reports and pictures that explored every aspect of the latest tragic chapter in the history of modern civil aviation.

Look at Page One:

 

This front page reflects professionalism of the highest order. No other paper in Bangalore had a front page dominated by a picture in this fashion. DNA's editors also focused, rightly, on one of the survivors when deciding the banner headline. And the newspaper management, in an exemplary gesture of sensitivity, and also to make space for the news, chucked out the front page ads, including the ear panels.

There were 10 other pages in the paper providing what it called "hypercoverage" of the tragedy. And the lead story in After Hrs, the features supplement, focused on air crashes too.

Undoubtedly, a comprehensive, coordinated, concerted effort. Not easy at the best of times, devilishly difficult at the worst of times. So kudos to Team DNA.
  • Arpan Bhattacharyya (Class of 2010) comments: Just one word: SUPER!

    ToI had an ad saying, ironically enough, "Impact Readymade Raymond". Rather tasteless. But desperate TIMES calls for desperate...

If advertising is going to be your career...

...and you have a portfolio ready, you may want to consider taking part in "portfolio night" -- "an opportunity for junior advertising professionals and students to meet the top minds of the industry and have their work reviewed."

Take a look at some of the names on the roster of judges who attended India's first portfolio night in Mumbai on May 20: Piyush Pandey, chairman of O&M; Prasoon Joshi, executive chairman of McCann Erickson; and R. Balakrishnan, chairman and chief creative officer of Lowe India.

Read all about it here in this comprehensive feature by Gouri Shah in Mint.

Thursday, May 20, 2010

Intros that address readers, intros that don't

Take a look at this intro in today's DNA. It's the lead story on Page 1 about India's first 3G spectrum auction:

Consumers across the country will be able to not just hear, but also see the person they are calling on the mobile phone by November this year, thanks to the successful wrap-up of India's first 3G spectrum auction. The availability of spectrum will enable mobile operators to provide new services like TV on mobile, games, and music, while also improving voice quality and reducing call drops.

This story was reported by Sreejiraj Eluvangal from New Delhi. Look how readers are drawn into the story with a description of the benefits that will accrue to them when 3G becomes a reality.

Here's the second para:

The government will collect Rs67,719 crore as its share of the booty from seven successful bidders, with Bharti Airtel and Vodafone Essar bagging the most lucrative circles. The two biggest cities in India, Delhi and Mumbai, will see 3G services being launched by Vodafone, Bharti, and Reliance Communications. According to operators, they are likely to start work on network planning and installation as soon as the provisional spectrum allocations are confirmed on payment of the requisite bid amounts.

The bid amount, the names of the auction winners, and some jargon in the form of "network planning and installation" and "provisional spectrum allocations" are not used in the intro because they can put off readers and prevent them from getting into the story quickly. The bid amount is also mentioned in the strapline, so, to avoid "stuttering", there is no repetition in the intro.

Now read the first few (messy) paras of the Times of India report by Shalini Singh:

After tremendous hype, hoopla, 34 days and 183 rounds of aggressive bidding by nine players, the 3G auctions drew to a close on Wednesday after raking in a whopping Rs 67,719 crore for the government.

The 3G bounty is almost double the original revenue estimates of Rs 30,000 crore by telecom minister A Raja and more recently, Rs 36,000 crore by finance minister Pranab Mukherjee.

Effectively, this translates to Rs 16,750.6 crore for a single pan-India slot of 3G spectrum. The government auctioned three pan-India 3G slots with additional spectrum in Punjab, West Bengal, Himachal Pradesh, Bihar and Jammu and Kashmir. BSNL & MTNL were already allocated 3G spectrum a year ago. They did not bid, but will now have to pay the 3G auction price for their spectrum holding.

Vodafone, Bharti and Reliance bagged the plum Delhi and Mumbai circles for a whopping Rs 3,316.9 crore and Rs 3,247.1 crore respectively.

Bharti, Reliance and Aircel won 13 circles each, Idea 11, and Vodafone and the Tatas 9 circles each. S Tel got three circles while Etisalat did not win a single one.

This story appears to be told from the government viewpoint how it stands to gain from the 3G auction and it's packed with numbers and details that are mind-boggling for the ordinary reader.

Which approach is better?

In my view, DNA's, by a long shot. DNA also provides a helpful sidebar that gives readers answers to the questions, What is 3G?, What's the right way?, and What will the cost be like?

When newspapers prefer advertisers over readers, it shows in the reporting too, doesn't it?
  • Dipankar Paul (Class of 2009) comments: Absolutely!
  • Arpan Bhattacharyya (Class of 2010) comments: I agree! One more point about the ToI intro:

    After tremendous hype, hoopla, 34 days and 183 rounds of aggressive bidding by nine players, the 3G auctions drew to a close on Wednesday after raking in a whopping Rs 67,719 crore for the government.

    If you read the paragraph, the writer has made a fundamental error (at least in my humble opinion), something that I am fanatical about when I write. I don't like the use of the word "after" twice in the same paragraph, in this case. It's like saying, "After I went to my uncle's house, I had a wonderful time after he made me a lovely lunch."

    Wednesday, May 19, 2010

    If it's your dream to be a novelist, you must read this...


    Master storyteller and long-distance runner Haruki Murakami is probably the best-known Japanese novelist in the world today, thanks to quirky bestsellers Blind Willow, Sleeping Woman (a collection of 24 short stories), Kafka On The Shore (a full-length novel) both of which I have read and many more.

    In Japan Murakami's popularity is such that the publication last month of his first novel in five years, 1Q84, set off a frenzy among his fans, forcing his publisher to increase the print run.

    He also writes non-fiction: What I Talk About When I Talk About Running was published in July 2008 and immediately became a bestseller. I chanced upon it at the Just Books library in JP Nagar a few months ago and, because I have been training to run at least five times a week at the gym, I was able to benefit from many of the insights Murakami offers.

    But this is what really struck me. There are many people, most of them youngsters, whose dream it is to write a novel. It is to them that Haruki Murakami really addresses these excerpts I have chosen from What I Talk About When I Talk About Running. Look at the three traits he lists as a must: talent, focus, and endurance. And see how he elaborates on each of these traits below:


    IN EVERY INTERVIEW I'M ASKED what's the most important quality a novelist has to have. It's pretty obvious: talent. No matter how much enthusiasm and effort you put into writing, if you totally lack literary talent you can forget about being a novelist. This is more of a prerequisite than a necessary quality. If you don't have any fuel, even the best car won't run.

    The problem with talent, though, is that in most cases the person involved can't control its amount or quality. You might find the amount isn't enough and you want to increase it, or you might try to be frugal to make it last longer, but in neither case do things work out that easily. Talent has a mind of its own and wells up when it wants to, and once it dries up, that's it. Of course certain poets and rock singers whose genius went out in a blaze of glory people like Schubert and Mozart, whose dramatic early deaths turned them into legends have a certain appeal, but for the vast majority of us this isn't the model we follow.

    If I'm asked what the next most important quality is for a novelist, that's easy too: focus the ability to concentrate all your limited talents on whatever's critical at the moment. Without that you can't accomplish anything of value, while, if you can focus effectively, you'll be able to compensate for an erratic talent or even a shortage of it. I generally concentrate on work for three or four hours every morning. I sit at my desk and focus totally on what I'm writing. I don't see anything else, I don't think about anything else. Even a novelist who has a lot of talent and a mind full of great new ideas probably can't write a thing if, for instance, he's suffering a lot of pain from a cavity. The pain blocks concentration. That's what I mean when I say that without focus you can't accomplish anything.

    After focus, the next most important thing for a novelist is, hands down, endurance. If you concentrate on writing three or four hours a day and feel tired after a week of this, you're not going to be able to write a long work. What's needed for a writer of fiction -- at least one who hopes to write a novel is the energy to focus every day for half a year, or a year, two years. You can compare it to breathing. If concentration is the process of just holding your breath, endurance is the art of slowly, quietly breathing at the same time you're storing air in your lungs. Unless you can find a balance between both, it'll be difficult to write novels professionally over a long time. Continuing to breathe while you hold your breath.

    Fortunately, these two disciplines focus and endurance are different from talent, since they can be acquired and sharpened though training. You'll naturally learn both concentration and endurance when you sit down every day at your desk and train yourself to focus on one point. This is a lot like the training of muscles I wrote of a moment ago. You have to continually transmit the object of your focus to your entire body, and make sure it thoroughly assimilates the information necessary for you to write every single day and concentrate on the work at hand. And gradually you'll expand the limits of what you're able to do. Almost imperceptibly you'll make the bar rise. This involves the same process as jogging every day to strengthen your muscles and develop a runner's physique. Add a stimulus and keep it up. And repeat. Patience is a must in this process, but I guarantee the results will come.

    In private correspondence, the great mystery writer Raymond Chandler once confessed that even if he didn't write anything, he made sure he sat down at his desk every single day and concentrated. I understand the purpose behind his doing this. This is the way Chandler gave himself the physical stamina a professional writer needs, quietly strengthening his willpower. This sort of daily training was indispensable to him.

    Writing novels, to me, is basically a kind of manual labour. Writing itself is mental labour, but finishing an entire book is closer to manual labour. It doesn't involve heavy lifting, running fast, or leaping high. Most people, though, only see the surface reality of writing and think of writers as involved in quiet, intellectual work done in their study. If you have the strength to lift a coffee cup, they figure, you can write a novel. But once you try your hand at it, you soon find that it isn't as peaceful a job as it seems. The whole process -- sitting at your desk, focusing your mind like a laser beam, imagining something out of a blank horizon, creating a story, selecting the right words, one by one, keeping the whole flow of the story on track -- requires far more energy, over a long period, than most people ever imagine. You might not move your body around, but there's gruelling, dynamic labour going on inside you. Everybody uses their mind when they think. But a writer puts on an outfit called narrative and thinks with his entire being; and for the novelist that process requires putting into play all your physical reserve, often to the point of overexertion.

    ***
    Later in this chapter, Murakami discusses the impact of his running on his writing:


    MOST OF WHAT I KNOW about writing I've learned through running every day. These are practical, physical lessons. How much can I push myself? How much rest is appropriate and how much is too much? How far can I take something and still keep it decent and consistent? When does it become narrow-minded and inflexible? To what extent should I be confident in my abilities, and when should I start doubting myself? I know that if I hadn't become a long-distance runner when I became a novelist, my work would have been vastly different. How different? Hard to say. But something would have definitely been different.

    In any event, I'm happy I haven't stopped running all these years. The reason is, I like the novels I've written. And I'm really looking forward to seeing what kind of novel I'll produce next. Since I'm a writer with limits an imperfect person living an imperfect, limited life the fact that I can still feel this way is a real accomplishment. Calling it a miracle might be an exaggeration, but I really do feel this way. And if running every day helps me accomplish this, then I'm very grateful to running.

    People sometimes sneer at those who run every day, claiming they'll go to any length to live longer. Most runners run not because they want to live longer, but because they want to live life to the fullest. If you're going to while away the years, it's far better to live them with clear goals and fully alive than in a fog, and I believe running helps you do that. Exerting yourself to the fullest within your individual limits: that's the essence of running, and a metaphor for life and for me, for writing as well. I believe many runners would agree.

    It is to your advantage to go out and buy (and read) this book. Here are the relevant details: What I Talk About When I Talk About Running, by Haruki Murakami; translated by Philip Gabriel; published by Vintage 2009; 192 pages.
      And if you find you're struggling with distractions when you're trying to get on with your writing, Mint's tech column Download Central has just the tool for you. It's an app called Writemonkey that hides all the windows and applications and forces you to type in a full screen text editor interface with very soothing colours. Like the idea? Go for it!
      • Commits alumna Sanaa Aesha (Class of 2008) comments: Writemonkey took me back to the good ol' feel of pencil against paper. Nothing shiny in between. Just better handwriting. So I guess this takes care of focus. Endurance, however, will take more than a monkey to achieve.

        Monday, May 17, 2010

        A book that attempts to inject a gender perspective into journalism

        Here's some advance information from Zubaan Books on a book that will be of great interest to all media students and also to journalists:

        MISSING: HALF THE STORY
        Journalism as if Gender Matters
        Kalpana Sharma ed.
        Zubaan Books
        Pages 304; Price Rs.395
        Toilets, trees, and gender? Can there be a connection? Is there a gender angle to a business story? Is gender in politics only about how many women get elected to parliament? Is osteoporosis a women's disease? Why do more women die in natural disasters? These are not the questions journalists usually ask when they set out to do their jobs as reporters, sub-editors, photographers, or editors. Yet, by not asking, are they missing out on something, perhaps half the story?

        This is the question this book, edited and written by journalists for journalists and the lay public interested in media, raises.

        Through examples from the media, and from their own experience, the contributors explain the concept of gender-sensitive journalism and look at a series of subjects that journalists have to cover -- sexual assault, environment, development, business, politics, health, disasters, conflict -- and set out a simple way of integrating a gendered lens into day-to-day journalism. Written in a non-academic, accessible style, this book is possibly the first of its kind in India -- one that attempts to inject a gender perspective into journalism.
        • Kalpana Sharma is an independent journalist, columnist, and media consultant based in Mumbai. She writes regularly for several newspapers and websites on a range of issues including urban development, gender, contemporary politics, and the media. She was, until 2007, deputy editor and chief of bureau, Mumbai, of The Hindu. She has also written and edited several books and is a founder-member of the Network of Women and Media, India.
        • Four other women journalists have collaborated on this book, edited by Kalpana: Laxmi Murthy, Rajashri Dasgupta, Sameera Khan and Ammu Joseph, who has written three of the chapters.

        Thursday, May 6, 2010

        How the press can endorse a political party...

        ...and, at the same time, disparage the prime ministerial candidate of a rival party:


        That's Britain's Daily Mirror for you, on the day the country goes to vote.

        How well do you know your men?

        Tehelka has this occasional series on Indian men, which the magazine began with this hilarious look at the contradictions in the Malayali male by Nisha Susan, the magazine's assistant editor.

        Here is an excerpt:
        (Yet,) seeking the typical Malayali man is a slippery affair. Each one looks out moodily and introspectively at you from behind varying amounts of facial hair. He’s sure he’s not typical, sure he’s misunderstood by his community. Simultaneously, he likes being Malayali and sure he’s the distilled Malayali, and others crude abominations.

        Then came the dissection of the UP, or Uttar Pradesh, man by Annie Zaidi, the Mumbai-based writer and author, who brings up the three broad categories into which she cast the UP man when she was growing up:
        White chikan kurta-clad sons of former zamindars who continue to rear pigeons and fly kites as a full-time occupation and sometimes carried guns, almost like a liability; the lean, inscrutable rickshaw-pullers/stone-breakers/gardeners; and the westernised, English-speaking intellectual. There was a time when, if a Hindi filmmaker wanted to create the character of a provincial intellectual, he would place the character in Allahabad — once known as the Oxford of the East. By the time I grew up, UP had cast off any intellectual pretensions it had and settled firmly into a mould defined by politics, caste and religion.

        Now, in the issue of May 1, Tehelka holds a magnifying glass over the Marwari man. "Don't show me the money, show me your mummy" is the headline to Tusha Mittal's insider piece on a world that is easily recognisable if you're a Marwari, like Tusha, one of the magazine's principal correspondents. Here is an excerpt:
        At his core, the Marwari man is a staid, almost docile, apolitical creature. Independent thinking has never been a good value. Asking questions is taboo.
         
        That is why a good Marwari mummy was horrified when her 16-year-old boy declared he wanted to be a journalist: “I have failed to bring you up”. Soon, the trauma took on entirely new proportions. “English honours? Isn’t that what girls do?” That was the first time the boy realised what it means to be a Marwari man. (Unless 3/50 in Math counts as the definitive moment of truth.)

        What has been deemed sacred in the Marwari home is “respect for elders” — a master stroke, a classic euphemism to ensure the old patriarchal values remain unchallenged and unquestioned. In the Marwari world, the daughter is merely an impediment in the quest for a son. A child of privilege, the Marwari man has always been comfortable with this status quo. “If the first child is a daughter, there’s a fear of what the second will be,” says Reshma Jain, editor of Marwar. If the second is a girl, try a third. If that fails, the bride and her chromosomes have clearly not understood the good values that prevail in Marwari society.

        All these pieces are laced with humour and written in good faith. Even so, there seem to be plenty of home truths for readers to absorb and think about.

        Here Kirti Bhotika (Class of 2008) gives us her reaction to the analysis of the Marwari man after I had sent her the link by email with my question: Anyone you know? Or recognise?
        Hahaha! Pretty much the whole clan!!! Why do you think I am marrying a guy who's NOT a Marwari :D
        Most of the article is absolutely true, Sir. But yes, things are changing. I have cousins who are working, (and no, they are not interior designers or fashion designers running a small boutique out of that extra useless room in their big houses) who are serious about their careers AND with the consent of not just their husband but the whole family! And I really admire those families. But yes, it is true that these kind of families would only be a small percentage. Another change that I have noticed is that Marwaris are happy if a girl is born - I must mention here that my father was overjoyed when I was born and distributed pots of rasgullas to the family, extended family, neighborhood, etc etc etc. :) What can I say, I am blessed! It's no longer a taboo when a girl is born in the family... There have been innumerable incidents of a son/sons betraying the father so finally it's dawned upon them that girls prove to be better in the long term. Yes! Girls rock! 

        And Sir, among all the cons, I love the pro that we still are so attached to our culture and traditions - I don't know where else would one follow all of it, with so much pride. It's a lot of fun and binds us together, I wouldn't want to let go of it.

        Yes, the weddings are bit show-off, but that can't be helped - our fathers believe, you got it or not, you flaunt it. Am not particularly happy about this...

        Would just like to end with this - every clan/caste/religion has its own set of pros and cons and we should strive to accept the pros and change the cons as much as we can, for the progress of our society.

        All valid points, Kirti. What do others have to say?
        • The July 10 issue of Tehelka has Pragya Tiwari's illuminating piece on the Bengali man. Read it here.