There is no rigid formula to the selection of stories and photographs for the front page. We — an argumentative group of editors — try every day to assemble a selection of articles that are important and interesting, but many variables influence the outcome. Some days, we gather for our Page 1 meeting with no doubt about the main stories of the day. Sometimes an event that is undeniably important falls short of the front page because it is unsurprising. Conversely, an event that initially seems like more of the same can seem major when you take into account all the circumstances.
Indian newspapers sometimes feature as many as 20 stories — big and small — on Page 1; more likely than not, you will see a dozen items on our cluttered front pages. The idea seems to be to have something for everyone on the cover itself. But the NYT has a different philosophy:
Most days we have room for six stories and an "Inside" box on the front page, so every candidate jostles with competing news. We try, moreover, not to have an overly homogeneous page — ALL foreign stories, or ALL business stories, or ALL Washington stories. We think stories about how we live often outweigh stories about what happened yesterday. We think it's okay to include in our front-page portfolio something that is fun, human, or just wonderfully written. It's part science, part art, with a little serendipity.
Keller also talks about the evolution of the newspaper front page in this era of hyper-coverage on television and on the web and elaborates on how his newspaper treats a news event whose "factual outline" has already been widely available before the NYT goes to press:
The notion of a Page 1 story, in fact, has evolved over the years, partly in response to the influence of other media. When a news event has been on the Internet and TV and news radio all day long, do we want to put that news on our front page the next morning? Maybe we do, if we feel our reporting and telling of it goes deeper than what has been available elsewhere. But if the factual outline — the raw information — is widely available, sometimes we choose to offer something else that plays to our journalistic advantages: a smart analysis of the events, a vivid piece of color from the scene, a profile of one of the central figures, or a gripping photograph that captures the impact of an event, instead of a just-the-facts news story.
BILL KELLER |
Read the full Q&A with Bill Keller here.
PS: The New York Times policy is to not clutter Page 1 with ads. How refreshing.
Interesting reading, especially for editors of Indian newspapers. Front pages are a very important way to communicate to your readers what your paper is all about. Indian newspapers just don't explore a wide range of subjects, and consequently most editors have little choice in shaping Page 1. Today's The Hindu is an interesting study. When was the last time a Bollywood star got second-lead status in its front page?
ReplyDeleteAs a member of the advertising fraternity, I'll pretend to be offended by the lack of an ad on Page 1. :) But in all seriousness, I think that being responsible for deciding what goes on Page 1 of a newspaper that so many millions read, is a daunting task; one that demands an extremely unbiased method of working. And I won't even begin to express unabashed amazement at the step-headlines! That never ceases to blow my mind!
ReplyDeleteI think it's about time that Indian newspapers work towards building a constructive, interactive forum for readers' so they can have their questions answered by the editorial team.
ReplyDeleteNewspapers are mature enough to realise that such a medium is important, I'm sure.