Search THE READING ROOM

Thursday, March 18, 2010

Here's what Stephen King has to say about The Elements Of Style...

...in his wonderful book, On Writing:
SECOND FOREWORD: This is a short book because most books about writing are filled with bullshit. Fiction writers, present company included, don't understand very much about what they do not why it works when it's good, not why it doesn't when it's bad. I figured the shorter the book, the less the bullshit.

One notable exception to the bullshit rule is The Elements of Style, by William Strunk Jr. and E.B. White. There is little or no detectable bullshit in that book. (Of course, its short; at eighty-five pages it's much shorter than this one.) I'll tell you right now that every aspiring writer should read The Elements of Style. Rule 17 in the chapter titled Principles of Composition is "Omit needless words." I will try to do that here.

MORE GEMS FROM ON WRITING
  • The adverb is not your friend. (Page 117)
  • The best form of dialogue attribution is "said", as in "he said, she said, Bill said, Monica said". (Page 120)
  • If you want to be a writer, you must do two things above all others: read a lot and write a lot. There's no way around these two things that I am aware of, no shortcut. (Page 139)
  • If you don't have time to read, you don't have the time (or the tools) to write. Simple as that. (Page 142)
  • The real importance of reading... (Page 145; please buy On Writing to read more.)
(Photo courtesy: Stephen King website)
  • On Writing was reviewed in Your Opinion by co-editor Padmini Nandy Mazumder, Class of 2011. 
ADDITIONAL READING (September 30, 2012): "A Brief History of The Elements of Style and What Makes It Great".

Have you tried Google Squared?

"Google Squared takes a category and creates a starter 'square' of information, automatically fetching and organizing facts from across the web." Should be helpful for your PowerPoint presentations at Commits.

Can you imagine writing a feature on Kolkata's street typists?

Rajdeep Datta Roy does a good job of it in Mint's Lounge. Here's an excerpt:
While those who sit in the business district and near the courts are comparatively better off, the typists who ply their trade in neighbourhoods such as the Shyambazar crossing, under the watchful eyes of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose astride a stallion, are finding it difficult to make ends meet. “Typists working in a bureau don’t have to worry about the space or the machines but, in turn, have to part with almost 50% of their meagre earnings,” says Sushil Das, who works in a bureau.

Read the feature here.
  • Mint was launched in Kolkata in June 2009.

How easy is it to write an interesting article on acronyms?

Here's how one Wall Street Journal reporter pulled it off.

Read that intro:
The New Deal gave the country the CCC, the TVA and the WPA. The waning days of the Bush administration produced TARP, for Troubled Asset Relief Program, also currently known as "the bailout." The stimulus package, the name of which is already a source of sniggers, has brought to life the RAT Board, LUST Trust and ARPA-E.

And here are the concluding paragraphs:
Departments that do choose to spell known words should take care -- poking fun at poorly chosen acronyms is already an Internet sport.

Jennifer Alicia Johnson, a former English teacher who now manages an afterschool program in Seattle, set up a blog in January to collect humorous examples.

"One does wonder, if they aren't fully thinking through their name, why should we believe they are fully thinking through their efforts?" she said.

Among her recent posts: the Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research, a 15-member council created under the recovery act that will (as the name suggests) coordinate research on the comparative effectiveness of medical treatments.

"Sounds like an OK idea to me," she wrote. "But the acronym? Say it aloud with me, now. FCCCER."

In the hands of an inexperienced writer, an article on acronyms can quickly turn into sludge. But Louise Radnofsky uses humour intelligently to lace her well-researched feature -- as a result, one is tempted to read from beginning to end.

If you're serious about improving your writing skills...

...here's a book which will be a big help: The Elements of Style, by William Strunk and E.B. White (it's available on Flipkart).

Read here what Stephen King has to say about The Elements of Style.

And King himself has written a book, On Writing, which is invaluable for both fiction and non-fiction writers; read the review (below) by Your Opinion co-editor Padmini Nandy Mazumder, who also tells us, bottom, why spending Rs.499 on The Elements of Style is "well worth it":

PADMINI NANDY MAZUMDER'S REVIEW OF STEPHEN KING'S CLASSIC.

Another book you must read if you want to be a better writer: On Writing Well (25th Anniversary: The Classic Guide To Writing Nonfiction), by William Zinsser. To know more about Zinsser and his masterpiece, click on this link: "Lord of the Language".

Start familiarising yourself with the contents of these books right away. You may not understand everything now, but continual reading will be a big help.

And here's one more really good book: Pocket Writer's Handbook, from the Penguin Reference Library. I bought this in Bangalore for Rs.195. It has a lot of sensible grammar advice, too.

As for dictionaries, I recommend that each of you buy a copy of what is referred to as an "advanced learners' dictionary" because this dictionary not only gives word definitions but also tells you how to use these words in a sentence. At Commits, we use the Macmillan English Dictionary For Advanced Learners (International Student Edition).

  • Padmini Nandy Mazumder (Class of 2011) commented via e-mail regarding her purchase of The Elements of Style: You were right, Sir, thank you for the recommendation. The Elements Of Style is really worth every single rupee. I bought it today [August 29, 2009]. And I'm glad I didn't procrastinate about it. Spending Rs.499 was well worth it because this "little book" has completely changed "English" for me.
(Padmini is now the editor of Books & More, a literary magazine published from Bangalore.)

Wednesday, March 17, 2010

If you're thinking of writing a feature...

...on the pulp magazines sold at our railway stations, here's a good role model. What a wonderful intro that is (complemented by a smart headline and standfirst)!

And look at this reference to Kafka in the second paragraph:
While I derived immense titillation from the pulpy prose and gross gore of stories headlined “Tormented teenager nephew slew paternal aunt” and “Misdeeds of a rapist blackmailer minister”, I gradually became aware of how the cultured Tamils were looking at me as if a Gregor Samsa-sized cockroach had taken my place. [Emphasis mine.]

Now every feature needs a good conclusion. This one is bang on target:
Truman Capote meets Bollywood? Yes, interestingly, this genre, which was pioneered by the American popular author with his “non-fiction novel” In Cold Blood (1966) about the apparently motiveless massacre of a Kansas family by two young psychopaths, is being taken forward in India by Verma with his true stories of tough ruffians, damsels in distress and the long hand of the law.

Clearly, you can learn a lot about writing features from the author, Zac O'Yeah, who is a thriller writer based in Bangalore. His novel, Once Upon A Time In Scandinavistan!, is due for release soon.

PS: Zac is married to Anjum Hasan, the author of Lunatic In My Head and Neti, Neti. Anjum, who had come to Commits recently to talk with the students about writing, is now the books editor of The Caravan.
  • Photo courtesy: Zac O'Yeah

Time Out's reviews are always...

...something special. Read this one of a bar in Bangalore called B-11 and tell me why I think it's a very clever piece of writing.



Monday, March 15, 2010

A fine example of long-form journalism from a great magazine

From Esquire:
It has been nearly four years since Roger Ebert lost his lower jaw and his ability to speak. Now television's most famous movie critic is rarely seen and never heard, but his words have never stopped.
***
Roger Ebert is a world-famous movie critic and his recommendations are looked forward to eagerly by film buffs. In this article, Esquire looks at how he continues to watch and critique films though he can't talk, eat, or drink. This is a terrific piece of writing and also a great human interest story.

Here are some interesting excerpts (though you should read the whole article; the photographs are very special, too):
Roger Ebert can’t remember the last thing he ate. He can't remember the last thing he drank, either, or the last thing he said. Of course, those things existed; those lasts happened. They just didn't happen with enough warning for him to have bothered committing them to memory — it wasn't as though he sat down, knowingly, to his last supper or last cup of coffee or to whisper a last word into Chaz's ear. The doctors told him they were going to give him back his ability to eat, drink, and talk. But the doctors were wrong, weren't they? On some morning or afternoon or evening, sometime in 2006, Ebert took his last bite and sip, and he spoke his last word.

**
He calls up a journal entry to elaborate, because it's more efficient and time is precious:

When I am writing my problems become invisible and I am the same person I always was. All is well. I am as I should be.

He is a wonderful writer, and today he is producing the best work of his life. In 1975 he became the first film critic to win the Pulitzer prize, but his TV fame saw most of his fans, at least those outside Chicago, forget that he was a writer if they ever did know.

**
But now everything he says must be written, either first on his laptop and funneled through speakers or, as he usually prefers, on some kind of paper. His new life is lived through Times New Roman and chicken scratch. So many words, so much writing — it's like a kind of explosion is taking place on the second floor of his brownstone. It's not the food or the drink he worries about anymore — I went thru a period when I obsessed about root beer + Steak + Shake malts, he writes on a blue Post-it note — but how many more words he can get out in the time he has left. In this living room, lined with thousands more books, words are the single most valuable thing in the world. They are gold bricks. Here idle chatter doesn't exist; that would be like lighting cigars with hundred-dollar bills. Here there are only sentences and paragraphs divided by section breaks. Every word has meaning.
  • Thanks to Anjali Muthanna (Class of 2006) for the tip-off.
PS: In September 2010, Roger Ebert reviewed I'm Still Here, the documentary on self-destructing Hollywood star Joaquin Phoenix. Read the review and you will marvel at Ebert's powers of description and his clear-headed view of everything that's wrong with Phoenix's life:
     One doubts he will be walking the red carpet if the film has a premiere. It documents a train wreck. A luxury train. One carrying Phoenix, his several personal assistants, his agent, his publicist, and apparently not one single friend who isn't on salary. A train that flies off the tracks and tumbles into the abyss.

    Phoenix comes across as a narcissist interested only in himself. He is bored with acting. He was only a puppet. He can no longer stand where he's told, wear what he's given, say what is written. It's not him. He has lost contact with his inner self. He allows that true self to emerge here as a fearsomely bearded, deliberately shabby chain-smoking egotist who screams at his patient assistants, blames himself on everyone else, and has deluded himself into thinking that there is a future in his dreadful hip-hop lyrics.

    Read the review in its entirety here: I'm Still Here.

    Sunday, March 14, 2010

    Shutterbugs will lurve this one

    Here's something weird: I didn't like her work at Bangalore Times which she edited for some time. And I wasn't too fond of her column in BT either -- it was too much like a personal blog, I thought. There didn't seem to be any "journalistic style". But what she has done with these pictures and the descriptions is simply amazing.

    Hats off to SUDHA PILLAI!

    This is a Facebook album, so you will need to have an FB account to be able to drool over these compositions (photos and text).

    PS: I'm betting you will love "Day 97: 2 a.m. friend" (pictured here). Am I right?
    • Thanks to Anagha Gunjal (Class of 2011) for the tip-off.

    Simple and fun...

    ...tests of vocabulary and grammar.

    Let me know how you fare. :-)