Search THE READING ROOM

Monday, May 3, 2010

The amazing books that made me fall in love with journalism all over again-2

Here's a book about journalists and journalism that reads like a thriller. The Gang That Wouldn't Write Straight: Wolfe, Thompson, Didion, and the New Journalism Revolution also does a great job of explaining why Tom Wolfe and the other New Journalists are held in such great regard.

But what is New Journalism?

It is a term that was devised to describe the immersive journalism practised by its adherents in the US in the sixties and the seventies. Here's an excerpt from the introduction to the book:

Within a seven-year period, a group of writers emerged, seemingly out of nowhere — Tom Wolfe, Jimmy Breslin, Gay Talese, Hunter S. Thompson, Joan Didion, John Sack, Michael Herr — to impose some order ... each in his or her own distinctive manner (a few old hands, like Truman Capote and Norman Mailer, chipped in, as well). They came to tell us stories about ourselves in ways that we couldn’t, stories about the way life was being lived in the sixties and seventies and what it all meant to us. The stakes were high; deep fissures were rending the social fabric, the world was out of order. So they became our master explainers, our town criers, even our moral conscience — the New Journalists.

The book is replete with revealing anecdotes and telling quotes. Here's one by Gay Talese on his writing style:

"I am a reporter who is forever in search of the opening scene. I never start writing until I have that scene, and then I become a man in search of a final scene. This all tends to take a lot of time."

Perhaps that is why articles in the New Journalism style were to be found in magazines such as Esquire, The New Yorker, and Rolling Stone rather than in newspapers.

Now here's Truman Capote on his interviewing style when he was researching the 1959 murders of the Clutter family in Kansas. His articles, first serialised in The New Yorker, were later published in book form as In Cold Blood:

"Capote never tape-recorded any conversations and never jotted anything down in a notebook during the entire six years it took for him to research the story. After each interview was complete, Capote would quickly retreat to his room at the Warren Hotel and type everything from memory and [stenographer and friend Nelle Harper] Lee's notes, then file it and cross-reference it. 'People who don't understand the literary process are put off by notebooks,' Capote told Life in 1966. 'And tape recorders are worse they completely ruin the quality of the thing being felt or talked about. If you write down or tape what people say, it makes them feel inhibited and self-conscious. It makes them say what they think you expect them to say.' If Capote felt that he had missed some crucial information the first time around, he went back and interviewed the same subjects over and over again until he had it right."

Here's another insight:

"Capote for years had claimed that he had taught himself to be his own tape recorder. As a memory exercise, he would have friends read or speak into a tape recorder as he listened; then he would quickly write down as accurately as possible what he had heard and compare it to the tape. Over time, Capote claimed, the differences between what was on the tape and what he had written became negligible."

After six years of research into the Kansas murders, Capote wrote a 1,35,000-word story which ran in four parts in four consecutive issues of The New Yorker beginning with the September 25, 1965, issue. "The series was a hit," writes Marc Weingarten in The Gang That Wouldn't Write Straight, "busting all previous sales records for the magazine. When Random House published it in book form as In Cold Blood, it heralded the arrival of a new form, what Capote called the 'nonfiction novel', and netted its author $2 million in paperback and film sales."

***
Jimmy Breslin is another journalist given star billing in the pantheon of New Journalism. Here is a pithy observation by Breslin:

"The best story ideas are the ones that sound good after the hangover has worn off."

And here's an eloquent description of his working style:

"[Jimmy] Breslin often didn't sit down at his typewriter until 4 PM or later, and then he'd make a mad dash to his 5.30 deadline... He would plunk himself down at a desk in the city room, hunching himself, according to Tom Wolfe, 'into a shape like a bowling ball. He would start drinking coffee and smoking cigarettes until vapour started drifting off his body. He looked like a bowling ball filled with liquid oxygen. Thus fired up, he would start typing. I've never seen a man write so well against a daily deadline.' By the time he pulled the last page out of his typewriter, Breslin's desk would be covered in a sea of crumpled notes and Styrofoam coffee cups, his copy a spiderweb of handwritten cross-outs and scribbled revisions. ...Editor Sheldon Zalaznick characterised Breslin's deadline crunching as 'absolutely heart-stopping but I never remember him ever missing a deadline'."

Now here's the intro to one of Breslin's greatest pieces, "Marvin the Torch".

"Marvin the Torch never could keep his hands off somebody else's business, particularly if the business was losing money. Now this is accepted behaviour in Marvin's profession, which is arson. But he has a bad habit of getting into places where he shouldn't be and promising too many favours. This is where all his trouble starts."

The New York Times blog, City Room, profiled Breslin a few months ago when he was feted by past colleagues. You can read the post here.

Now back to The Gang That Wouldn't Write Straight and a final word from Mr New Journalism himself, Tom Wolfe:

"[Tom] Wolfe decided to pursue a career in journalism, if only because it would allow him to write steadily, without the uncertain financial vagaries of fiction writing. Wolfe wrote letters of introduction to 120 papers all over the country and received only one encouraging response from the Springfield Union in Springfield, Massachusetts. 'They hired me, mainly because they were curious about this guy with a Ph.D. from Yale who wanted to work on their paper,' said Wolfe."

Want to know more about The Gang That Wouldn't Write Straight? Go here.

ALSO READ:

Dealing with office jerks

We have all had to deal with difficult people in the office, be they bosses or peers. Will understanding the reasons for their obnoxious behaviour help to reduce the pain of workplace conflicts? That is what some managers and coaches are betting on, according to this report in The Wall Street Journal, which was reproduced in Mint today.

Here are some excerpts:
Amid a growing focus on workplace quality, some managers and coaches are now using new techniques to identify the childhood origins of harmful behaviour at work and then rout out those patterns through training or outright bans on bad behaviour.

Sylvia LaFair, a White Haven, Pennsylvania, leadership coach and psychologist, has identified 13 different patterns of office behaviour—and the family dynamics that likely shaped them. Among the types are the “persecutor” who micromanages or abuses others. This person often grew up with abuse or neglect. The “denier” pretends problems don’t exist; this person may have grown up in a family where everyone feared facing unpleasant emotions. “Avoiders” are aware of problems but won’t talk about them. In a tense situation, their mantra is, “Gotta go!” “Avoiders” often grew up in judgmental families with weak emotional ties, Dr LaFair says.

The “super-achiever” is driven to excel at everything, breeding resentment by walking over other people. They were often called on in childhood to make up for family shame or tragedy. Another type, the “martyr”, does his or her work and everybody else’s too, but drives co-workers away by complaining, she says. The “martyr” often had parents who gave up their dreams for the child, triggering a repeat of the pattern. Dr LaFair documents the various patterns in a 2009 book, Don’t Bring It To Work.

Do you recognise yourself? Or a colleague?

Read the whole article here. It could help you.

The amazing books that made me fall in love with journalism all over again-1

A.J. Liebling is hailed as the first of the great New Yorker writers, a "colourful and tireless figure who helped set the magazine's urbane style".

I recently finished reading Just Enough Liebling, an anthology of his articles from the New Yorker. Read these excerpts and you will get an insight into the ingredients of great writing.

  • From “A Good Appetite” (New Yorker, 1959):
“The primary requisite for writing well about food is a good appetite. Without this, it is impossible to accumulate, within the allotted span, enough experience of eating to have anything worth setting down. Each day brings only two opportunities for field work, and they are not to be wasted minimizing the intake of cholesterol.”

  • From “Paris the First” (New Yorker, 1959):
“The graphic arts had their origin in the free patterns made in the snow by Ice Age man with warm water. This accounts for the fact that there have been few good women painters. Lot’s wife, who looked behind her, may have been a pioneer, but we had a head start of several million years.”

  • From “Poet and Pedagogue”, Liebling’s magnificently descriptive feature on the New York professional debut of Cassius Clay, soon to thrill the world as Muhammad Ali (New Yorker, 1962):
 “Honest effort and sterling character backed by solid instruction will carry a man a good way, but unearned natural ability has a lot to be said for it. Young Cassius [Clay], who will never have to be lean, jabbed the good boy [Sonny Banks] until he had spread his already wide nose over his face.”

A.J. LIEBLING "CHANGED THE RULES OF MODERN JOURNALISM, BANISHING THE
DISTINCTIONS BETWEEN REPORTING AND STORYTELLING, BETWEEN NEWS AND ART".
  • INTRO from Liebling’s “The World of Sport” (New Yorker, 1947):
“A police reporter sees more than he can set down; a feature writer sets down more than he possibly can have seen. I was eager to get a good job as a police reporter after I took my degree. As a maraschino cherry on the sundae of academic absurdity, the degree was entitled Bachelor of Literature, although what literature had to do with rewriting the [New York] Times paragraphs I never found out. I went swimming on commencement day.”

  • CONCLUDING PARAGRAPH from Liebling’s “The World of Sport” (New Yorker, 1947):
“One night some boy with pimples in his voice called up from Brooklyn to tell the Times about a particularly unfascinating [basketball] contest between two Catholic-school fives. I took the call and noted down all the drear details until I got to who was the referee. 'Who was he?' I asked. 'I don’t know,' the kid said, 'and anyway I ain’t got any more nickels.' So he hung up. We couldn’t use a basketball score in the Times without the name of the referee, so I wrote in 'Ignoto', which means 'unknown' in Italian. Nobody caught on, and after a while I had Ignoto refereeing a lot of basketball games, all around town. Then I began bragging about it, and after a short while my feeble jest came to the ears of [the sports editor Major] Thomas.

“ ‘God knows what you will do next, young man,' he told me after the first edition had gone to press on a bitter night in March. ‘You are irresponsible. Not a Times type. Go.'

"So I lost my first newspaper job.”

If you want to know more about the book, go here.

Friday, April 30, 2010

How NOT to write a profile

The IPL controversies have led to many names being dragged in the mud, perhaps deservedly so. But did Sunanda Pushkar have to be lambasted in this fashion in the Outlook issue of April 26? Here are a couple of excerpts from Vrinda Gopinath's profile of the woman labelled in a pull-quote "the P3P queen of Masala Dubai":

Her skills in occasionally getting well-known sponsors made her rivals green with envy but the snide bitching barely fazed her. Says a former rival acidly, “Sunanda would claw her way to a sponsor and have him eating out of her hands, she was not a girl’s girl.”

*
Sunanda-watchers in Dubai say it was around this time she adopted her new style statement—Dubai flash trash of peroxide hair streaks, heavy make-up, razzle-dazzle, seductive couture, false eyelashes, chrome nail paint, and Louis Vuitton victimhood. It was a sign of her arrival in the league of the neo-rich tycoons.

Some of the facts in the article are possibly true. But most of the writing seems to be speculative; plain bitching, in my view.
  • On the other hand, Shoma Chaudhury has tried to present Sunanda's side in this interview in Tehelka (April 30). Chaudhury also takes the media and the rest of us to task. Here's an excerpt from the introduction:
A deep and unthinking misogyny has underscored all the reporting on her. Her real crime is that she is an attractive 46-year-old widow, who is bright, vivacious and hot — in the way only those women can be who have a comfortable relationship with themselves; who understand that beauty does not preclude one from being kind; or protect one from sorrow. If the media had wanted to try the two [Sunanda and Shashi Tharoor] for financial impropriety, it should have stuck to doing that. Instead, all of it has become an ugly spectacle about a society trying to decide what women are allowed and not allowed to be. Ambition, sass, and self-assured sexiness are clearly high on the list of India’s penal code for women.

Read the full interview here.
  • Thanks to Nilofer D'Souza for the tip-off.

Thursday, April 29, 2010

Why is Plato known as Aflatoon in the subcontinent?

Mint columnist Aakar Patel gives us the lowdown in this erudite, fact-filled, and interestingly written piece.

Also, here's another interesting column on the origins of our gaalis.
  • Aakar Patel, former editor of Mumbai's Mid Day, is now the director of Hill Road Media. His column in Mint, "Reply To All" touches upon the most unusual topics. On March 25, he explained why Indians are too self-absorbed to be team players; on January 21, he must have sparked a myriad classroom, boardroom, and cocktail party conversations with his analysis of why women are turned on by power, men by beauty. Bookmark his column and read it regularly.

Monday, April 26, 2010

Calcutta in the New York Times


Somini Sengupta has produced a gem of a travel piece in the New York TimesPay attention to the writing style. See how Somini begins the piece; study the transitions how does she link one para to the next?

Study the quotes there are not many because a piece littered with quotes can be very boring and see how they add punch to the writing. Somini also paraphrases some of what she has been told by her sources.

The whole feature is a great example of good writing you want to read from beginning to end.

The article ends with an apt quote. It is very important to provide an appropriate conclusion to every feature (but not to hard news reports).

Also pay attention to the sidebars: If You Go; Where To Stop; Where To Eat; What To Do At Night; Where To Stay; Getting There.

And isn't that a fantastic picture at the top of the page of a young bride at the Kalighat temple in south Calcutta? Go through the slide show, too.
  • Photo courtesy: The New York Times

Friday, April 16, 2010

Time says the iPad will usher in a new era for journalism

The managing editor of Time, Richard Stengel, writes: "In the media these days, we have to participate in things that we also cover. I am not one of those who see the tablet as the solution for all the media's problems, but I do see it as a dynamic new way that we can present great reporting and writing to our readers. For the first time since the magazine's birth in 1923, we will soon be delivering the entire contents of TIME to paying customers in a radically different way: as a self-contained application that you can download to the iPad."

"The Reporter: A Handbook For Every Journalist"

Here's an interesting book that should be helpful for media students. Though it has its share of typos and cliched writing, The Reporter has some useful advice for novice journos. The authors Arindam Basu and Sujoy Dhar, both senior journalists, have thoughtfully included sections on the different kinds of reporting: from beat reporting to rural reporting and political reporting to wire reporting they are all in this handbook.

An added attraction: There's an "expert view" at the end of each chapter, with well-known journalists like Rajdeep Sardesai and Raju Narisetti, the founding editor of Mint, weighing in on the important issues in their field.

A copy has been placed in the Commits library but those interested in print journalism will benefit from buying a copy. At Rs.175, it is a steal.

Heard of online video cartooning?

No? Well, when Mark Fiore won the Pulitzer Prize for editorial cartooning this week, it was the first time since the category of editorial cartooning was created in 1922 that the Pulitzer had gone to an artist whose work does not appear in print.

The Pulitzer jury said Fiore's "biting wit, extensive research and ability to distill complex issues set a high standard for an emerging form of commentary" -- 
online video cartooning. Read more here.

And go here to enjoy his work.

The BEST blog on photojournalism

Lens the New York Times blog on "photography, video, and visual journalism" is a magnificent web classroom for photography buffs, especially those keen on photojournalism.

In the section titled "Art of Photojournalism", you can study "the finest pictures, past and present". In "Craft of Photojournalism", you can go behind the scenes and on assignment with news photographers around the world.

And these are just two of the gems waiting to be discovered by Commitscions.

Dig into this veritable treasure here


And here's a topical post on the Pulitzer Prizes for photography.